Welch v. Tufts lawsuit (1760)

  1. 250th Gallery
  2. Welch v. Tufts lawsuit (1760)

The case is an appeal heard before the Massachusetts Superior Court of Judicature, the highest court in Massachusetts prior to the American Revolution. The case originated in the Charlestown Inferior Court when Phoebe Tufts sued Thomas Welch for slander and defamation. In the first lawsuit, Phoebe Tufts won her case and the jury awarded her four pounds lawful money plus court costs (which would go to pay salaries for judges, clerk plus expenses of jury and witnesses). Welch appealed this decision to the SCJ, which confirmed the decision but lowered the penalty paid to Tufts to two pounds, ten shillings, roughly a 35% decrease in what she received. However, Welch then had to pay court costs for the second trial as well. In total, Welch paid 7 pounds 18 shillings and five pence (much more than the 4 pounds he might have paid after the county case). Key takeaways: the plaintiff paid nearly twice what he would have paid if he had stopped at one trial (possibly a signal not to waste the court’s time with silly appeals); parties like Welch probably concluded that trials in this period were too expensive and took too long; and lastly, that women of the eighteenth century heard insulting language that focused upon their chastity, while adding racial innuendos.

Read More
Document
Information
Thomas Welch of Medford in the County of Middlesex Glazier Appellant vs Phoebe Tufts of said Medford Widow Appellee from the Judgment of an Inferiour Court of Common Pleas held at Charlestown in and for said County, on the second Tuesday of December last, when and where the appellee was  plant[iff]. and the appellant was def[endan]t. In a plea of Trespass on the case for Whereas the said Phoebe is and always was a person of good Fame and Reputation and free from the Crimes of Fornication whoredom, and carnal Copulation with Negroes of all which the sd. Thomas was well knowing but minding and malitiously Contriving to ruin and destroy her Caracter and reputation and Subject her to an ignominious corporal punishment, did on the first day of April law, at Medford aforesaid, with a loud voice in the hearing of diverse of His Majesty's leige Subjects falsely and Maliciously speak publish and declare of and concerning the said Phoebe these false and scandalous Words. following namely "The Widow Tufts (speaking of and meaning the said Phoebe) is a negro whore" "she (meaning the said Phoebe) had a Negro Bastard born of her Body" (meaning born of the said Phoebe's Body) "she (again speaking of and meaning the said Phoebe) had a mollatto Child that was born of her Body" (meaning born of the said Phoebe's Body) "there is a negro Child that was born of her body (meaning born of the said Phoebe's Body that is as big as your Abner" (meaning Abner Lealand a man grown) The Widow Tufts (speaking of and meaning the said Phoebe) has had a Bastard by a Negro (meaning that the said Phoebe had had a Bastard Child born of her Body that was begotten by a Negro) and by means of the said Thomas's speaking and publishing the false and scandalous words aforesaid of and concerning the said Phoebe she has been brought into great Contempt and disgrace exposed to the insults of her neighbours and others, and suffered great Grief and Vexation of spirit to the damage of the said Phoebe Tufts as she says the sum of a hundred pounds; at which said Inferiour Court Judgment was Rendred, that the said Phoebe tufts recover against the said Thomas Welch the sum of Four pounds lawful money damage, and Costs; Both Parties now appeared and the case after a full hearing was Committed to a Jury sworn according to Law to try the same who Returned their Verdict therein upon Oath that is to say, they find for the appellee two pounds ten shillings Lawfull Money of this Province Damage, and Costs. It's therefore Considered by the Court that the said Phoebe Tufts Recover against the said Thomas Welch the sum of two pounds ten shil Lawful Money of this Province Damage, and Costs taxed at L5.8.5.

Institution(s):

Ames Foundation, Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Burnham-MacMillan Endowment Fund of the History Department (Western Michigan University)

Editor(s):

Sally E. Hadden

Source Note

Records of the Massachusetts Superior Court of Judicature, 1760-1762 volume, 2verso-3recto, Massachusetts State Archives, Boston.

Editorial Process & Document History

This volume was created by the court clerk of the Superior Court of Judicature after the case had been decided, drawing upon rough notes (sometimes called minutes or minute books). The fair hand copy left by the clerk was created after the fact.

The volume was microfilmed by the Genealogical Society of Utah and was subsequently digitized by FamilySearch. The images were then transcribed professionally by the Ames Foundation and transcriptions may be found on the Ames Foundation website as well as the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, which underwrote the transcription verification process.

Additional Details

The Association for Documentary Editing

The ADE brings historical documents to life by helping editors preserve, interpret, and share important records from the past with the public.